![]() Your best hope for privacy on the internet is that no one cares about you personally, and your communications are not swept up in connection with someone they do care about - but there is no possibility of absolute privacy on the public internet.Apple does a much better job of stopping trackers than Androud does. ![]() Even if you use Tor, that's likely compromised at the state level (primarily funded by the US Government), even if you use a private VPN, someone owns those servers and someone definitely owns the connections between the two. I hate to tell you, but even if you block ads, the fact that you are a registered and logged-on user of this site means you have a browser cookie and are being tracked to some extent or another, and more so if you're using this site with your smart phone. Your best hope for privacy on the internet is that no one cares about you personally, and your communications are not swept up in connection with someone they do care about - but there is no possibility of absolute privacy on the public internet. I post in a couple boards like this anonymously and have a LinkedIn page (but I’m not active in it). I remain one of the very view people without a Facebook page as well for that reason. I'm not really sure what the concern is specifically with what Google could do with the photos you shoot, but I'd be interested in hearing what that is, and what cloud solution you prefer to Canon+Google. Why then would Canon's offering alone, or paired with another provider, be safer? Do you even know whose cloud Canon's data is stored on? Because I guarantee they're not running their own physical datacenter.Ĭould be AWS (Amazon) or Azure (Microsoft), could be Google, could be any number of other providers.ĭo you understand transport security/encryption from end-to-end, and which ones the three letter agencies of the US and other countries have either broken into or have a backdoor into those networks? Or how absolutely boned your home router probably is (if someone wanted to get your traffic), or your cellphone if you use that for any data transfer? Ok, fine, you don't trust the safeguards Google as a provider of cloud services has in places. It’s not trusting what they do with them. I don’t think it’s about them losing your files. CR2 files on their cloud which means I'm using storage that would normally cost me well more than what they charge for Prime, and I'm sure I'm not the only one. As it is, I doubt Amazon is chomping at the bit to extend their "unlimited" coverage. If this ever got fixed, It would be a dream system for those using Prime + image.canon: Unlimited long-term automatic cloud backup of RAW files straight out of your camera over wifi. Obviously this workaround wouldn't work if the files are coming straight from Canon. CR3 file into the DNG, makes for a much larger file. CR3 as video files from a data accounting standpoint and does not include them in the "unlimited" category. It doesn't support CR3 does it?No, Amazon treats. With Amazon Prime, you have unlimited full-size photo storage and it supports RAW formats.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |